Discussion, Questions, Help

I've been enjoying getting to understand setting up some custom models, and doing some comparison with other wave models I'm familiar with.

Something I am finding is that when inspecting the wave conditions within the model simulation, even at the boundary my significant wave height is considerably less than I would expect based on the input conditions.

I wonder if there is any guidance on what might be occurring, or how to address this.

Many thanks

Tom

Hello, I am trying to run a simulation using Celeris WebGPU but I am observing large instabilities when refining the mesh. I was wondering if anybody had seen something similar and if maybe you were able to overcome this problem?

The simulation is around the San Antonio port and Maipo river in Chile. I am forcing a 14s period, 31.4cm amplitude wave from the west boundary of this bathymetry as a prototype. This is how the topo/bathy looks like:

You can see that in the north west portion of the domain there is a deep water region (dark-colored) that corresponds to the geological trench.

When I run it with resolutions of dx=10m or higher everything goes smoothly. But if I change to dx=4 for example, even with Courant numbers as small as 0.01 I get the result below:

Hi, first of all thanks for sharing celeris webgpu.

I was checking that most if not all examples have a tridiag_solve = 2 option, but when inspecting the code I could not find any mention to this name, not in constants_load_calc.js nor Run_Tridiag_Solver.js.

Am I missing something maybe?

Thanks

Thanks for the great tool ! Excited to play with it.

It seems I get stuck at this stage ? Did you have with working on Linux box at all before ?

Thanks